Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    22
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thoughts on this setup (crank arm length+chainring)

    Hey guys,
    This is the setup I am currently thinking of putting on my new build: 44t Sugino chainring with 140mm crank arms. 15t cog in the rear. Why this setup? Because I'm short. Like 4"10 short. My only concern is that this might be a bit difficult to pedal because it's harder to generate torque with such a short crank arm length. What are thoughts on this? Should I go 150mm instead? It's only .5" gain . . .
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    GONE~
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    6,745
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Assuming you're using 700c wheels, 44/15 is not going to be an easy ratio and your 140mm cranks might take some muscle to get the bike rolling.

    Is there any way you can try out the cranks before you buy them?

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    22
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Forgot to mention i'm running 650 wheels. The GI is around 72 so it's pretty moderate - I might switch out the rear to a 16t... SF is hilly!

  4. #4
    Blaster of Reality Scrodzilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    24,630
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    72gi with 650 wheels and a 140mm cranks still seems like a pretty wonky setup.

  5. #5
    Veteran Racer TejanoTrackie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
    My Bikes
    28 frames + 73 wheels
    Posts
    7,952
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Try using this crank arm length calculator as a starting point >>> http://www.machinehead-software.co.u...alculator.html

    Note that it's based entirely on your leg (inseam) length, rather than overall height.

    As to choice of gearing, I'd be inclined to go a lot lower than 72 gi given your riding conditions, regardless of crank arm length.
    What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

    Quote Originally Posted by Dcv View Post
    I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Kayce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    St Louis
    Posts
    1,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You can also use sheldon brown's gain inch system to compare everything, it includes crank arm length in its comparisson factor

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    22
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I measured my inseam and the calculator said 143 for crank arm length. Meh.

  8. #8
    Carbon Fiberless quickmoney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Riding fixed in SF @ 72 GI = Character building to the max!

    I agree with other posts - you should stay in the low to mid 60's given the shorter crank length (less leverage) and what I would guess is a very modest amount of weight you would be able to apply when standing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •