Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    imi
    imi is offline
    aka Timi imi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    My Bikes
    Bob Jackson World Tour (touring) and a Miyata 100 (commuting)
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    1" threaded or 1" threadless?

    This topic must have been discussed before but I've searched and not come up with the opinions which will tip the balance.

    I'll be ordering a Bob Jackson World Tour frame which comes off-the-peg either with optional 1" threaded or 1" threadless fork (I presume uncut). 1 1/8" threadless is not an option.

    As far as my understanding goes the pros and cons are:

    Threaded:
    • Quill stem (e.g Nitto Technomic Deluxe)
    • Height adjustability
    • Lesser choice of handlebars (26mm)
    • Converter to threadless 1 1/8" stems and thus 31.8mm handlebars


    Threadless:
    • Limited stem choices
    • Shim necessary for 1 1/8" stems
    • No height adjustability once cut

    At the moment I am most inclined to go for the threaded fork with a converter (what are the disadvantages of that combination?)... but will (as always) listen to BF wisdom!

    Thanks and Happy New Year!

  2. #2
    Senior Member CNY James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Syracuse, NY
    My Bikes
    2010 Felt F5, 2010 Dawes SST-AL
    Posts
    809
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wouldnt worry about stem options if you go threadless, there are a billion options out there, perhaps moreso than going with a quill stem (unless you buy adjustable)

    I personally am using an adapter because IMO it gives you the best of both - I can adjust height as I wish, if my reach isn't comfortable, I can swap out with moderate ease, and the same with angle. That said, I dont have 100 stems to cover all of my options... I got an adapter that goes from 1" to 1.125 & have the 31.8 mm handlebar.

  3. #3
    Senior Member bbllaakke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Michigan
    My Bikes
    Raleigh Sports, Giant Cadex, Waterford X-11, Specialized Rockhopper Comp FS, Viscount Aerospace Pro, Scwinn Passage
    Posts
    193
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The good thing about threadless for touring is you only have to bring an allen key for maintenance. For threaded you need to carry a large wrench, sometimes two, depending on your headset.

    With that being said my touring bike has a threaded headset.

  4. #4
    Senior Member dorkypants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    374
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Personally I'd go threadless. You can have the stem cut so you can use spacers for some height adjustability: spacers can be placed below and/or above the stem, just don't overdo below-the-stem. I prefer the bar clamps on threadless stems as you don't have to finagle the bars through the stem and risk scratching them: while the odds of causing a sufficiently severe gouge to raise stress-fractures on an aluminum bar are minimal, it could happen. A shim to use 1-1/8" stems on a 1" steerer is no big deal and works well.

    If you're really a stickler for stem adjustability, Look makes(? used to make?) a ridiculously adjustable threadless stem with a couple of pivot-joints, for extension and height. Not cheap, but it's an option.

  5. #5
    Is Right
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    235
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here's a vote for threaded. The height adjustability of a threaded setup is huge for me. Plus it just looks better IMHO. As for headset wrenches, I think with any half-decent headset, once adjusted correctly you won't need to touch it even on the longest of tours.

  6. #6
    Senior Member tarwheel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    5,878
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I went for threaded (quill) on my BJ. That was one of the reasons why I bought the frame. Threaded stems look better, IMHO, and are much easier to dial in the height. Plus if you cut a threaded fork and later try to sell the bike, it might be too short for prospective buyers. There is not a stem sold today that is nicer looking or higher quality than a Nitto Deluxe or Pearl. The weight differences between a Nitto and most threadless stems are minimal.

  7. #7
    __________ seeker333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,619
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've used both recently, and prefer threadless.

    Quality threaded stems are very limited availability now, limiting choices in length/angle, expensive and relatively heavy.

    I agree with Tarwheel in that threaded stems have an appearance advantage on C/V style bikes. I use Thomson Elite stems when I can get them discounted. They are quite good-looking for a threadless stem, and tops in strength/longevity.

    For threadless all you have to do is cut the steerer extra long and add spacers above stem, then cut down later once your information/confidence improves.
    Last edited by seeker333; 01-01-10 at 01:53 PM.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    PNW lifer
    My Bikes
    2007 C-dale 63cm T series. My 1994 was a better design 1994 Bianchi 61cm El/OS Sachs 2004 Rodreguiz 26' UTB touring thing
    Posts
    322
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like threaded but on a bike with couplings it would be kinda silly.

  9. #9
    imi
    imi is offline
    aka Timi imi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    My Bikes
    Bob Jackson World Tour (touring) and a Miyata 100 (commuting)
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    escii_35, why would that be silly?

  10. #10
    Senior Member tarwheel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    5,878
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    head tube

    Imi - Here is a photo of the head tube -- with a ruler -- on my 23" World Tour.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  11. #11
    Senior Member staehpj1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Parkville, Md
    Posts
    7,260
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Both have advantages. I would probably pick the threadless though. Threaded was great for my daughter and our other Trans America companion though. They were not sure what they wanted in bar height and it was so easy to raise and lower the threaded one as they changed theier minds numerous times in the first fe weeks.

    I don't like the looks of threadless with a stack of spacers, but it isn't an issue for me because I like my bars 4-5" below the saddle.

  12. #12
    imi
    imi is offline
    aka Timi imi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    My Bikes
    Bob Jackson World Tour (touring) and a Miyata 100 (commuting)
    Posts
    1,973
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks everybody for your answers (and for the picture Tarwheel, this was related to a PM)... Seems to be a matter of personal preference rather than a clear cut choice, but your comments have certainly clarified things for me. BF, you're BEST!

  13. #13
    Senior Member BigBlueToe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Central Coast, CA
    My Bikes
    Surly LHT, Specialized Rockhopper, Nashbar Touring (old), Specialized Stumpjumper (older), Nishiki Tourer (model unknown)
    Posts
    3,389
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wouldn't make it a major criterium in deciding on a bike. If I liked a bike, it wouldn't matter much. However, all other things being equal, I'd go with threadless. There are a bizzillion choices (I know - I've bought half a bizzillion.)

  14. #14
    More Energy than Sense aroundoz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    155 miles north of Spokane
    My Bikes
    Thorn Sherpa, Co-Motion Custom Road, Salsa Fargo, Mercian King of Mercia and Motobecane Fantom Pro 29er
    Posts
    710
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A lugged frame begs to have a quill stem.

    However, if you don't know your reach and decide after a while you need a different length stem, changing out bars w/ a quill stem is a lot more work than with a threadless set up.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •