Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Is this all I need to convert to threadless?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Is this all I need to convert to threadless?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-15 | 08:16 PM
  #1  
Bugstomper2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Richardson, Texas

Bikes: 1989 Trek 1200

Is this all I need to convert to threadless?

I want to convert from my quill stem to a modern threadless. Would all I need be the following? Obviously, I'm excluding the stem itself.
Brand-X Quill Adaptor Alloy | Chain Reaction Cycles
M Part Splined Headset Spacer | Chain Reaction Cycles
would the spacers sit flush? Or would the stem be wider than the 1" spacers and would I need to buy a new top cap?
Bugstomper2000 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-08-15 | 08:19 PM
  #2  
Bugstomper2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Richardson, Texas

Bikes: 1989 Trek 1200

And should I buy a threadless headset?
Bugstomper2000 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-08-15 | 08:21 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Likes: 10
Keep your threaded quill stem. For ease of height adjustment, it can't be beat. If you need a taller stem, go with a Nitto Technomic.

About the only thing a threadless stem has going for it is you can more easily swap out bars but getting a height extension with them sucks.

Sometimes old really is better than new.
NormanF is offline  
Reply
Old 10-08-15 | 08:51 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 4
From: SoCal

Bikes: 89 Schwinn 754, 90 Trek 1100, 93 Trek 2300, 94 Trek 1400 (under construction), 94 Trek 930, 97 Trek 1400

I just bought a threadless adapter so I so make use of the stem, handlebars, Shimano Sora brifters, and Tekro interrupter levers that were on the Felt F90 that I parted out.

I'm building up a Trek 1400 frame that I got off eBay, and although I already have a quill handlebar stem and handlebars for it, I wanted to try the Sora brifters, and the Tekro interrupter levers without removing them from the Felt handbars (different diameter from the SR handlebars and stem that I already had on the Trek.

By buying a chromed quill threadless adapter from the local Performance Bicycle Store for $14.99 (same price as online from China), I was able to drop the complete Felt F90 handlebar assembly onto the Trek, without having to wait for the adapter to be delivered from China.

Now let's look at your situation, and your questions.

The Performance threadless adapter comes with the adapter body, a quill wedge, a top cap, and the long bolt for the quill locking wedge. It works the same as a quill stem locking to the steering tube to hold it in place.

You do not need to buy a threadless headset, as you will still be using your conventional threaded headset. You do not need any spacers, because the threaded headset is still going to be holding the fork in place. Spacers are necessary on true threadless system to take up the extra fork steerer length so the headset can be secured. Since you are still using a quill system, the spacers are not necessary.

The threadless adapter only has around 1" of vertical adjustment. If you need more rise than that, you need to look at threadless handlebar stems with a different angle or rise, OR buy a threadless extension adapter which will attach to the top of the threadless adapter. Adding height to the handbars is a PITA with threadless headset systems. It's not like the ease of buying an extra long/tall quill stem.

The cap that comes with the threadless adapter is a smaller diameter than is used on true threadless stems. The cap is trapped because the quill bolt can't be removed. Removing the quill bolt and the cap would drop the lock wedge. The threadless adapter cap is not used to set the preload/tension on the fork and headset. The larger diameter of the cap on a true threadless system is to keep the handlebar stem from sliding over the cap before the stem bolts are tightened. The adapter cap is a smaller diameter so you can slide the threadless handlebar stem onto the threadless adapter without removing the threadless adapter and sliding the handlebar stem on from the bottom of the threadless adapter.

So to go to a threadless handlebar stem on your threaded headset bicycle. All you need is a threadless adapter (as long as the limited rise of about 1" is okay), a threadless handlebar stem with a clamp diameter that is compatible with your existing handlebars, and some handlebar wrap to rewrap your handlebars if you need to unwrap them to move the handlebars to the new threadless handlebar stem.

Last edited by RoadGuy; 10-09-15 at 10:06 AM.
RoadGuy is offline  
Reply
Old 10-08-15 | 11:08 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Bugstomper2000
And should I buy a threadless headset?
If you do you'll need to buy a new fork too
rms13 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-09-15 | 04:33 AM
  #6  
CliffordK's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 27,576
Likes: 5,453
From: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Originally Posted by Bugstomper2000
And should I buy a threadless headset?
Originally Posted by rms13
If you do you'll need to buy a new fork too
That opens a whole new can of worms.

The vintage roadbikes all had 1" forks. Vintage MTBs had 1 1/8" forks.

You can, of course, get 1" threadless forks and headsets. And maybe 1" spacers. But, then the selection of 1" threadless stems is limited, so you'll probably end up with a 1 1/8" threadless stem and shims.

Anyway, if I was going to replace the fork anyway (steel ==> CF, building up forkless frame, etc), then I might consider converting from original threaded to threadless.

Otherwise, I'd probably stick with the threaded + adapters.

Or, just use the quills that have worked for ages. I put a winged handlebar on one bike necessitating a 2-bolt open faced stem, but somehow I accidentally found a 26.0 winged handlebar (which apparently is relatively rare now). And, there are a few quills that take the 26.0 bars with a 2 bolt face.
CliffordK is offline  
Reply
Old 10-10-15 | 03:23 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 4
From: SoCal

Bikes: 89 Schwinn 754, 90 Trek 1100, 93 Trek 2300, 94 Trek 1400 (under construction), 94 Trek 930, 97 Trek 1400

Originally Posted by CliffordK
That opens a whole new can of worms.

The vintage roadbikes all had 1" forks. Vintage MTBs had 1 1/8" forks.

You can, of course, get 1" threadless forks and headsets. And maybe 1" spacers. But, then the selection of 1" threadless stems is limited, so you'll probably end up with a 1 1/8" threadless stem and shims.

Anyway, if I was going to replace the fork anyway (steel ==> CF, building up forkless frame, etc), then I might consider converting from original threaded to threadless.

Otherwise, I'd probably stick with the threaded + adapters.

Or, just use the quills that have worked for ages. I put a winged handlebar on one bike necessitating a 2-bolt open faced stem, but somehow I accidentally found a 26.0 winged handlebar (which apparently is relatively rare now). And, there are a few quills that take the 26.0 bars with a 2 bolt face.

Trek supplied 1" threadless forks on the 1993 2300 Composite bike. The only model year (and model) they did a threadless fork on Composite bikes. They also supplied some threadless 1" forks on some model year carbon bikes (but never on the bonded aluminum bikes from what I've found).

I played with the idea of converting some of my Trek bonded aluminum bikes to 1" threadless using original Trek threaded forks from larger frame bonded aluminum bikes. I figured that if I could find the fork from a really big Trek bonded aluminum frame, the steerer tube would be longer enough for me to hack off the threaded end of the steerer tube, and still have acceptable length on it to attach the threadless headset and stem with spacers (this would yield the largest choice of paint colors, plus the choice of chromoly or aluminum fork blades). Or maybe get the threadless 1" fork from a 1993 Trek 2300 (pretty rare and only came in one color) that is the same size frame as the Trek bikes I would be looking to convert.

Profile still makes 1" quill stems with 26mm handlebar clamps and 2-bolt clamps. I have one (in black) that the PO of my 97 Trek 1400 installed. From what I've seen they are available in polished silver (didn't see any of the black ones offered) on eBay. Personally, I think they look kinda clumsy (skinny post with large horizontal tubing and clamp), but that's my personal opinion.

I prefer the classic of the Cinelli, 3T, or Sakae single bolt quill stems.

Last edited by RoadGuy; 10-10-15 at 03:27 PM.
RoadGuy is offline  
Reply
Old 10-10-15 | 04:03 PM
  #8  
Stucky's Avatar
Old Fart
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 3
From: Bumpkinsville

Bikes: '97 Klein Quantum '16 Gravity Knockout

Originally Posted by NormanF
Keep your threaded quill stem. For ease of height adjustment, it can't be beat. If you need a taller stem, go with a Nitto Technomic.

About the only thing a threadless stem has going for it is you can more easily swap out bars but getting a height extension with them sucks.

Sometimes old really is better than new.
^This.

OP, why do you want to convert? Unless there's some strange situation, there's no advantage to going threadless- Quill stems rock! (Actually, they stay nice and tight...no rocking at all ! )
Stucky is offline  
Reply
Old 10-10-15 | 09:16 PM
  #9  
Bluechip's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 17
From: Cypress TX

Bikes: Salsa Fargo Ti, Cannondale CAAD9, Carbonello Fixed Gear, Specialized Epic Disc

All you should need is the adapter and stem. No spacers should be needed. I love the look of a nice quill stem but I just made the change recently on an older bike just to be able to use a modern bend handlebar with a 31.8 diameter.
Bluechip is offline  
Reply
Old 10-11-15 | 06:34 AM
  #10  
Homebrew01's Avatar
Super Moderator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,979
Likes: 1,154
From: Ffld Cnty Connecticut

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Originally Posted by NormanF
Keep your threaded quill stem. For ease of height adjustment, it can't be beat. If you need a taller stem, go with a Nitto Technomic.

About the only thing a threadless stem has going for it is you can more easily swap out bars but getting a height extension with them sucks.

Sometimes old really is better than new.
Quill adapters can be raised/lowered just like a quill stem. Same concept.

Another advantage of a quill adapter is it's much easier to swap out stems for a different length or rise.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-11-15 | 06:36 AM
  #11  
Homebrew01's Avatar
Super Moderator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,979
Likes: 1,154
From: Ffld Cnty Connecticut

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Originally Posted by Bugstomper2000
I want to convert from my quill stem to a modern threadless. Would all I need be the following? Obviously, I'm excluding the stem itself.
Brand-X Quill Adaptor Alloy | Chain Reaction Cycles
M Part Splined Headset Spacer | Chain Reaction Cycles
would the spacers sit flush? Or would the stem be wider than the 1" spacers and would I need to buy a new top cap?
Just the adapter, skip the spacer.
I have done this on 2 of my vintage bikes.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-17-15 | 01:37 PM
  #12  
Bugstomper2000's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Richardson, Texas

Bikes: 1989 Trek 1200

Originally Posted by Stucky
OP, why do you want to convert? Unless there's some strange situation, there's no advantage to going threadless- Quill stems rock! (Actually, they stay nice and tight...no rocking at all ! )
Do threadless stems rock? I want more options for adjustment, because I'm growing and for whatever reason my bike isn't...
Bugstomper2000 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hvergelmir
Bicycle Mechanics
8
06-09-14 01:14 PM
back4more
Bicycle Mechanics
13
11-08-12 03:28 PM
xenologer
Bicycle Mechanics
17
12-22-10 01:29 PM
mickel
Bicycle Mechanics
17
07-07-10 12:24 AM
imi
Touring
13
01-02-10 12:18 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.