Originally Posted by
JFlurett
My problem with this, is what the first few posters seemed to not grasp. He did not hit the cyclist, he "shot AT" him.
So because of the way we handle things in this country.... the fact that he did not "succeed" or hit the target, his sentence is different than if he did. THAT is my problem. Who cares if he didn't actually hit him?
DUDE FIRED A GUN AT SOMEONE'S HEAD!
THAT is the BS.
Actually, the shooter hit the guy's cycling helmet. The bullet went through the helmet. That's cutting it kind of close if you are just trying to fire a warning shot.
After reading the various news accounts, my conclusion is the that law handled this case pretty fairly. I actually am kind of surprised they didn't let him off the hook, and if it had gone to a jury trial, it wouldn't have shocked me if there was a hung jury. Despite the relatively short sentence, the "fire fighter's" life is essentially screwed. He lost his job, has a felony record, and it will be tough finding new employment given the conviction and high unemployment rate in NC right now.