Old 11-25-09 | 11:35 AM
  #2  
stausty
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 659
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by akcapbikeforums
Dear Abby,

The 1984 Centurion Catalog shows (see the left half of the photo below) the rear rack on the Pro Tour and the Elite GT perfectly horizontal, level with the top tube, and with the lower anchoring point attached to the rearward and lower of the two eyelets.



I just recently picked up an 83 Pro Tour 15 (see right half of above pic) where the rack's lower attachments are installed in the upper/forward of the two eyelets -- forcing the rack to "slope" from horizontal (i.e., from the top tube angle) and forcing the forward rack attachments to bend (notice they DO NOT bend in the catalog photos).

It seems simple enough to unbend the rack attachments and install the rack per the catalog photograph -- and it seems clear that whoever did the original installation was an idiot and installed the lower rack attachments in the wrong eyelets.

Or were they an idiot? Aren't the rearward/lower eyelets usually reserved for fenders? How can you install a rear fender in the upper eyelet... where it's now blocked by the rack attachment?

The bike, by the way, is rather minty -- and since I know the seller and original owner, I know it never has had a rear fender installed.

Thanks, Sleepless in Virginia Beach
If it doesn't work right where it is now, why not just move it? Chances are the LBS that assembled it just did it quickly and didn't worry about it or the original owner didn't know any better. Or there's an unforseen problem that you haven't come across yet because you haven't tried to install the rack in the other set of eyelets. As for fenders - you can always double-stack the attachments to the same eyelet with some longer bolts or find fenders that clip to the rear rack, if bending the fender struts won't make enough clearance to get to the other set of eyelets.
stausty is offline  
Reply