View Single Post
Old 01-07-10 | 12:23 AM
  #92  
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
TejanoTrackie
Veteran Racer
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,854
Likes: 913
From: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas

Bikes: 34 frames + 80 wheels

Originally Posted by Brian
For the majority of bikes owned by people that post here, the only noteworthy difference from a mechanical standpoint is which way the back wheel is mounted. Yes, they are operated differently, but mechanically, they're essentially the same.
I think the point is that the FG and SS experiences are very different. For example a FG almost demands good foot retention, but it is pretty much optional on an SS. You need to be constantly alert on a FG when descending hills or cornering or making tight turns, but can be pretty casual on a SS. For me my FG is a much more intense experience than riding my SS. I get a hard workout on my FG, but don't break a sweat on my SS. My FG is a performance machine with a stiff aluminum track frame and clipless pedals, whereas my SS is an old vintage steel road frame with relaxed geometry, fenders, rack, and double-sided pedals w/o clips or straps. FG and SS are similar but not the same.
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Reply