View Single Post
Old 04-22-10 | 02:20 PM
  #17  
robncircus's Avatar
robncircus
Gunner.
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 9
From: Santa Clarita, CA

Bikes: Giant TCR, Spooky Skeletor, Pivot Mach 6

Originally Posted by DaveSSS
Confusion reigns. Setback posts are the norm, for the vast majority of road bikes. With the general trend toward steeper STAs, setback posts are now more important than ever. Finding a nonsetback post on a pro's bike is rare.

The front to rear weight balance should not be 2/3 on the rear. I use a lot of saddle setback, with the nose of my saddle 6-7cm behind the BB center at a 73cm saddle height. Even with a lot of setback and a short torso, I have about 45% of my weight on the front wheel. Anything less than 40% is too light, IMO. The weight balance should be measured with the rider in his most agressive cornering/descending position.
Dave tell us again how many pros you have fitted since you bring them up so often?

I use a non-setback post. My STA on my current rig is 73.5. I have very small legs and smaller than normal femurs. With a setback post it feels like I'm "reaching" with my legs to make a full pedal stroke. Fitting is just like anything else.... there are a variety of opinions on the topic. Some say KOPS, some say not KOPS, and some say other things. I was fitted by someone considered to be one of the best in So Cal (and he actually has fitted pro cyclists) and he uses KOPS as a starting point. Just get fitted by someone with a good reputation and tweak if you're uncomfortable or experience displeasure. The notion to do what the pros do is so ridiculous that I'm still surprised people bring it up.
robncircus is offline  
Reply