View Single Post
Old 07-07-10 | 09:55 AM
  #11  
cudak888's Avatar
cudak888
www.theheadbadge.com
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 29,010
Likes: 5,501
From: Southern Florida

Bikes: http://www.theheadbadge.com

LBS know nothing, or they're too blinded by compact frames to know any better. 32" inseam here, and many of my machines hit the 31" mark, if not the 32". I never feel it nor hurt myself on 'em. The slightest angling of the frame when dismounting takes care of that.

That said though, the 2010 RRA is a compact frame. A 58/59cm ST example will likely have a much longer top tube than you expect. Compact frame sizing is completely different from traditional. Size your frame based on your preferable effective top tube length; not the seattube length.

-Kurt

P.S.: I saw you riding the 23" (ST) Armstrong a few days ago. The fit looked fine. Don't change the winning combo.

P.P.S.: You wouldn't happen to have spoken to an arrogant little, glasses-wearing, hipster clod at Bike Tech on Bird Rd., eh? I generally get along with everyone else, but I flatly refuse to deal with that jerk. I have no trouble admitting that to his face either - that's how much of a creep he is.
__________________













Last edited by cudak888; 07-07-10 at 12:18 PM.
cudak888 is offline  
Reply