View Single Post
Old 08-21-10 | 11:26 AM
  #75  
CrockerCock
Felon
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX

Bikes: Fixie Conversion- Old frame(I think Spalding haha) custom painted myself with cannondale saddle, orignal seat post, decalless shun track crank, decalless vuelta deepdish wheelset, czar cst road competition tires, bullhorns and tange BB

I thought the thread was about how you thought you were proving a point by being super OCD about a very minuscule problem(if it can be called that). The definition of "quality of ride" has nothing to do with the point of the ride, since a minor(very very minor) weight imbalance would not affect the ride enough for any human to notice. In fact it is only when you are sitting in our house with your bike upside down trying to prove your flawed intelligence that you were able to notice that there even was a weight imbalance. It started as someone tried to politely correct you that weight imbalance is generally a problem in cars and rarely with bikes. I'm sure you felt insulted that a lowly BF member corrected you, so you felt the need to search for(I would even go as far to say created one) a problem. Finding something and using a joke as a so-called "theory" to try and put yourself in the right. The fact remains that you shaved off micrograms of material which got a result you were looking for. The key words being "looking for". If you had created a video where you rode your bike and went "I think something is wrong" proceeded to shave off metal then hopped back on and said "wow perfect". Then this thread would be more plausible. Unfortunately that is not the case, instead of basing it off of what you feel you found it with your bike upside down. Just give it a rest you haven't proven anything to anybody.
CrockerCock is offline  
Reply