View Single Post
Old 08-24-10 | 04:47 PM
  #27  
njkayaker
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 15,293
Likes: 1,771
From: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Originally Posted by jonathanb715
Nope. If you took a tape measure all the way around the outside of the tire, it will give the same distance whether the tire is loaded down or not (within reason - the material obviously does stretch in the real world, but not enough to matter).
We don't care what the rest of the tire is doing.

Originally Posted by jonathanb715
This is the circumference.
No, this isn't the "circumference" because the loaded and low-pressure tire is not a circle!

==============

Let's try it this way.

1) Remove the tire. Do the rollout. That's the smallest possible radius or circumference (*). This represent a wheel without any pressure and/or a very large load.

2) Put a completely rigid tire on (one that does not deform). Do the rollout. That's the largest possible radius or circumference. This number represents a tire that at maximum pressure without any load.

A real tire with any particular pressure and load (weight of the cyclist and bike) will yield some radius or circumference between the two above values.

If you have less pressure or more weight (more deformation), the radius or circumference will be closer to the smallest radius or circumference.

=====

* (This number is actually too small because it doesn't include the thickness of a completely uninflated tire.)

Last edited by njkayaker; 08-24-10 at 04:58 PM.
njkayaker is offline  
Reply