Originally Posted by
chasm54
In the first place, your argument is essentially that anyone who indulges in risk-taking behaviour that might cause them injury and impose an unnecessary burden on the health system should be stopped, so that we don't have to pay for them through our taxes..
I don't think that was his argument at all. He didn't say a word about stopping anyone from doing anything or forcing them to do anything.
This is not (or shouldn't be) about requiring anyone to do anything. It is about what things you should consider when making your own individual choice.