Originally Posted by
tFUnK
This makes sense intuitively, but I find it hard to believe that a certain rim (Velocity Aerohead) in 32h would weight any different than a 28h version.
As Mrvile pointed out, that wasn't my point. You reduced the spokes without keeping the strength relatively constant. The Aerohead comes in a 20h version, but it wouldn't hold the same weight rider as the 32h would.
Originally Posted by
mrvile
I've always wondered about the low spoke count thing. Does spoke count affect aerodynamics much, given the same rim? I'm aware that the aerodynamics of a deeper rim generally come from the fact that there is just less spoke length exposed in the frontal profile, but for many of these 30mm rim wheels (which is hardly aero), it seems that a 16-spoke front is frivolous considering the weight of the rim itself.
I wonder as well. It's a big debate as to exactly how much spoke count affects aerodynamics. But I agree with you that 30mm is hardly aero. That's why I went with the XR-200 rim on my build. If I can't go truly aero, I might as well go truly light.
Originally Posted by
patentcad
I rode my 2006 Ksyrium ES wheels (the last pair of Mavic wheels I have left) at last 20,000 miles. Now the rims are so worn they're cupped, I'm waiting for the replacement wheels. now. But they never needed truing in all that time. I think I may have had the bearings on the rear hub repacked once. Amazing hoops. That being said there are lighter wheels out there. I'm not sure they'll be that bulletproof however. We'll find out.
Good for you. Actually, I am seriously impressed the set lasted the wear life of the rim wall without truing. I would let you know if my uber light wheels last that long without truing, but the new little cyclist in my life is making me think it will take a lifetime to get another 20,000 miles in.