View Single Post
Old 12-04-10 | 04:24 PM
  #11  
chaadster
Thread Killer
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 13,140
Likes: 2,162
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Originally Posted by Carley P.
Chaadstar, I can see how people would want to be identified as a cyclist. I often commute on a road that has a speed limit of 45 and people go well over that speed limit. There are a lot of businesses right next to the road, along with crosswalk signs, advertisement signs, and other lights that sit right next to the street. Since the motorists are moving sometimes almost 55 miles per hour, it's probably hard for them to realize I'm even moving, since they're going almost five times as fast as me. If they don't think I'm moving, they're likely to think I'm not on the road, but on the side of the road. They could think I'm a lit-up mailbox, a crosswalk sign, or something else. If they can actually see someone on a bike moving, they'll realize that I'm on the road and that there is more danger to hitting me than just losing a side-view mirror.

Even so, I don't think you can ever have TOO much lighting. I have five lights and two reflectors (not counting my pedal reflectors) on my bike and I still sometimes get nervous when there is a lot of traffic zooming past me.
I appreciate the reply, but you make all the assumptions that I doubt, namely that drivers decide to hit things (you mention signs and mailboxes) but don't hit things they recognize as bicycles. It doesn't make sense to me.

Drivers hit things because they either don't see them or because they aren't paying attention. A modern, bright taillight is sufficient if the driver is paying attention, and nothing is sufficient if they aren't.
chaadster is offline  
Reply