Old 04-05-11 | 08:43 PM
  #30  
wkndwarrior
BlueTrekker
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX

Bikes: Trek 1.2 triple

Originally Posted by mambac
the double is better IMO. It's lighter, if you count grams, it requires less width in your pedal motion, and having a triple is really unnecessary. I currently roll a triple with 52-42-30 in front and 12-26 in back. I rode from Vail to Breckenridge in the Colorado Rockies, which from Vail to the pass, is as steep as a climb can get, i never went to the small ring in front. If you legs dont have the power to turn the small ring in front on a double, then stick with a triple, otherwise it's useless.
lol, you're a better man than me... I did a 50 miler this weekend on hills that were 3-5% grade, nothing too crazy (it's Texas so no mountains here), and I STILL needed the small gear on some of the longer and steeper climbs. Overall, I'm pretty happy with the new cassette because I felt more comfortable shifting between the middle gears because they're closer together.
wkndwarrior is offline  
Reply