Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Thinking about going from triple to double

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Thinking about going from triple to double

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-11 | 08:23 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,660
Likes: 177
You could go with the 50 and a 24 for the small ring. This will allow for a tighter rear cassette if that's what you want.
davidad is offline  
Reply
Old 03-28-11 | 12:59 PM
  #27  
Thread Starter
BlueTrekker
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX

Bikes: Trek 1.2 triple

Update. I kept the triple but when I replaced the chain, I got a 12-26 cassette instead of another 11-26. Can't wait to try it out...
wkndwarrior is offline  
Reply
Old 03-28-11 | 11:54 PM
  #28  
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0

Bikes: Trek 1200

the double is better IMO. It's lighter, if you count grams, it requires less width in your pedal motion, and having a triple is really unnecessary. I currently roll a triple with 52-42-30 in front and 12-26 in back. I rode from Vail to Breckenridge in the Colorado Rockies, which from Vail to the pass, is as steep as a climb can get, i never went to the small ring in front. If you legs dont have the power to turn the small ring in front on a double, then stick with a triple, otherwise it's useless.
mambac is offline  
Reply
Old 03-29-11 | 06:52 PM
  #29  
Drew Eckhardt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,341
Likes: 326
From: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA

Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs

Originally Posted by mambac
the double is better IMO. It's lighter, if you count grams, it requires less width in your pedal motion, and having a triple is really unnecessary. I currently roll a triple with 52-42-30 in front and 12-26 in back. I rode from Vail to Breckenridge in the Colorado Rockies, which from Vail to the pass, is as steep as a climb can get,
Most of the climbs in the Colorado Rockies don't get worse than 5-6% which includes going over Vail Pass (mostly 2-4%)
https://mybicycleroutes.com/xvailinfopage.html. Tough climbs get 2-4X steeper.

You need to try a little to find truly steep routes. Try Magnolia road in Boulder which hits 12%. This year's Mike Horgan Hill Climb heads up that route, so if you want to have fun with partial road closures give it a try on July 2nd.

Mt Zoncolan in the Giro hits 22%
Drew Eckhardt is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-11 | 08:43 PM
  #30  
Thread Starter
BlueTrekker
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX

Bikes: Trek 1.2 triple

Originally Posted by mambac
the double is better IMO. It's lighter, if you count grams, it requires less width in your pedal motion, and having a triple is really unnecessary. I currently roll a triple with 52-42-30 in front and 12-26 in back. I rode from Vail to Breckenridge in the Colorado Rockies, which from Vail to the pass, is as steep as a climb can get, i never went to the small ring in front. If you legs dont have the power to turn the small ring in front on a double, then stick with a triple, otherwise it's useless.
lol, you're a better man than me... I did a 50 miler this weekend on hills that were 3-5% grade, nothing too crazy (it's Texas so no mountains here), and I STILL needed the small gear on some of the longer and steeper climbs. Overall, I'm pretty happy with the new cassette because I felt more comfortable shifting between the middle gears because they're closer together.
wkndwarrior is offline  
Reply
Old 04-05-11 | 10:49 PM
  #31  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast

Bikes: 8

is as steep as a climb can get
Aw come on I'm sure people can come up with steeper climbs.

Against the traffic flow up 'the crookedest street in the world'
Lombard street in San Francisco.

Or say, Highland Scotland.. B862 the southern shore of Loch Ness from Ft Augustus ,
up towards Foyers, [where the water head-drop powered aluminum refining for the RAF in the early 40's]
small wonders the A82 is along the north shore gets most of the traffic..

Last edited by fietsbob; 04-05-11 at 10:55 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Reply
Old 04-06-11 | 03:28 AM
  #32  
Banned.
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
fwiw, i'm not in love with my compact double for the reason the op has realized; i have to constantly shift up front whereas before i mostly kept it in the middle ring with an occasional drop to the granny for the biggest uphill climbs and quick trip to the big ring for downhills. I only went with a compact because i got hooked up with some free shifters and they were a double so going with a triple on that bike would have cost me $100 for a left shifter.
motobecane69 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
darwin zabel
Road Cycling
49
03-27-18 02:20 PM
Podagrower
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
9
05-11-15 06:45 PM
lotown.pedaler
Road Cycling
2
07-05-11 02:19 PM
thcri
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
34
12-29-10 11:29 PM
7bmwm3gtr
Road Cycling
31
02-21-10 02:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.