Thinking about going from triple to double
#28
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Bikes: Trek 1200
the double is better IMO. It's lighter, if you count grams, it requires less width in your pedal motion, and having a triple is really unnecessary. I currently roll a triple with 52-42-30 in front and 12-26 in back. I rode from Vail to Breckenridge in the Colorado Rockies, which from Vail to the pass, is as steep as a climb can get, i never went to the small ring in front. If you legs dont have the power to turn the small ring in front on a double, then stick with a triple, otherwise it's useless.
#29
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,341
Likes: 326
From: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
the double is better IMO. It's lighter, if you count grams, it requires less width in your pedal motion, and having a triple is really unnecessary. I currently roll a triple with 52-42-30 in front and 12-26 in back. I rode from Vail to Breckenridge in the Colorado Rockies, which from Vail to the pass, is as steep as a climb can get,
https://mybicycleroutes.com/xvailinfopage.html. Tough climbs get 2-4X steeper.
You need to try a little to find truly steep routes. Try Magnolia road in Boulder which hits 12%. This year's Mike Horgan Hill Climb heads up that route, so if you want to have fun with partial road closures give it a try on July 2nd.
Mt Zoncolan in the Giro hits 22%
#30
Thread Starter
BlueTrekker
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Bikes: Trek 1.2 triple
the double is better IMO. It's lighter, if you count grams, it requires less width in your pedal motion, and having a triple is really unnecessary. I currently roll a triple with 52-42-30 in front and 12-26 in back. I rode from Vail to Breckenridge in the Colorado Rockies, which from Vail to the pass, is as steep as a climb can get, i never went to the small ring in front. If you legs dont have the power to turn the small ring in front on a double, then stick with a triple, otherwise it's useless.
#31
Banned
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 43,586
Likes: 1,380
From: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 8
is as steep as a climb can get
Against the traffic flow up 'the crookedest street in the world'
Lombard street in San Francisco.
Or say, Highland Scotland.. B862 the southern shore of Loch Ness from Ft Augustus ,
up towards Foyers, [where the water head-drop powered aluminum refining for the RAF in the early 40's]
small wonders the A82 is along the north shore gets most of the traffic..
Last edited by fietsbob; 04-05-11 at 10:55 PM.
#32
Banned.
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
fwiw, i'm not in love with my compact double for the reason the op has realized; i have to constantly shift up front whereas before i mostly kept it in the middle ring with an occasional drop to the granny for the biggest uphill climbs and quick trip to the big ring for downhills. I only went with a compact because i got hooked up with some free shifters and they were a double so going with a triple on that bike would have cost me $100 for a left shifter.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
darwin zabel
Road Cycling
49
03-27-18 02:20 PM





