Originally Posted by
ki7he
Could you give an example of what you would consider "proof" that he didn't do anything? If lack of a positive test isn't proof enough I can't fathom what he could produce that prove he didn't do it.
Apparently, whatever "proof" he's issued, isnt good enough, or there wouldnt be people still questioning him about epo's some years later? So, if he needs to give out more "proof", to clear his name? then he should probably do so?
I dont think you've read the entire thread, and certainly NOT the last few posts. The questions are still there, even someone @ the top of the Cycling federation, has questioned it, and wondered why LA hasn't done more to clear his name?
Im still waiting for the person who claimed Lemond was using "transfusions", to post the info.
I still dont think Armstrong was 100% clean when he won his TDF titles, but thats just me. It will eventually come out that he wasn't "clean". My guess is, his supporters, wont be supporting him very much then?