View Single Post
Old 09-14-11 | 09:31 AM
  #24  
RFC's Avatar
RFC
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,466
Likes: 24
From: Scottsdale, AZ

Bikes: many

Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
This is obviously going to be very subjective...but here's my take.

Classic isn't a function of age, though age can be a contributing factor. Bikes that are classic are the bikes that we drool over and likely can't afford when new. They're the best of the best. They began a style or were representative of that style. Classic bikes are the ones that we'd have bought if money wasn't an object and we purchased only based on our emotions. Classic bikes are often the ones that defined a period of cycling...for instance, Armstrong on his Madone is an iconic image. Classic bikes are the ones kids will want when they get middle aged and become collectors.

Classics are timeless, beautiful and cross cycling niches in their appeal. They have something that differentiates them from the other bikes on the market. They are the best in class.
I agree with this sentiment and want to add that there is a difference between "classic" and "vintage." So, for example, my 1998 Litespeed Ultimate is not vintage, but is, arguably, classic in the uniqueness of its design and it's place in cycling history. This was the bike that was ridden to the sprint victory in the 2001 tdf.
RFC is offline  
Reply