Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

What Qualifies as "Classic?"

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

What Qualifies as "Classic?"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-11 | 10:54 AM
  #26  
Scooper's Avatar
Decrepit Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,488
Likes: 92
From: Santa Rosa, California

Bikes: Waterford 953 RS-22, several Paramounts

Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
This is obviously going to be very subjective...but here's my take.

Classic isn't a function of age, though age can be a contributing factor. Bikes that are classic are the bikes that we drool over and likely can't afford when new. They're the best of the best. They began a style or were representative of that style. Classic bikes are the ones that we'd have bought if money wasn't an object and we purchased only based on our emotions. Classic bikes are often the ones that defined a period of cycling...for instance, Armstrong on his Madone is an iconic image. Classic bikes are the ones kids will want when they get middle aged and become collectors.

Classics are timeless, beautiful and cross cycling niches in their appeal. They have something that differentiates them from the other bikes on the market. They are the best in class.

Originally Posted by khatfull
Classic is related to style and design.
Vintage is related to age.

It is possible to have a vintage bike that isn't classic, think 70's Free Spirit:

It is possible to have a classic bike that isn't vintage, think 2011 Cinelli SuperCorsa (thought I'd build it with much different components, think the frameset):

/thread
I agree with both of these sentiments. It's interesting that lotek quoted Richard Sachs as he was introducing his new lugs with a 14mm head tube extension early in the thread. I consider my 2007 Waterford RS-22 "classic" even though it has "modern" 953 OS tubing, Richard Sachs' stainless Newvex lugs with the 14mm extension, and Ergo shifters. What makes it classic to me is its geometry with a horizontal top tube and frame dimensions and angles virtually identical to my 1972 Paramount.
__________________
- Stan

my bikes

Science doesn't care what you believe.

Last edited by Scooper; 09-14-11 at 11:46 AM. Reason: typo
Scooper is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-11 | 11:06 AM
  #27  
KonAaron Snake's Avatar
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 15,946
Likes: 371
From: Philadelphia, PA

Bikes: Two wheeled ones

What makes Scooper's 953 classic to me is the desireability of the tubing, the way he built it...the aesthetic choices are all spot on, the builder and the style. It's the next evolutionary step from one of Kurt's chrome Paramounts. It also satisfies my "best of the best" requirement and the "I'd do it if I could afford it" requirement.
KonAaron Snake is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Spaghetti Legs
Classic & Vintage
2
03-03-18 01:52 PM
jdw777
Classic & Vintage
30
03-12-17 11:39 AM
MZilliox
Classic & Vintage
54
06-15-15 01:13 PM
Yo Spiff
Classic & Vintage
50
01-03-12 09:24 AM
stringbreaker
Pacific Northwest
18
04-26-10 02:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.