Originally Posted by
RazrSkutr
But you're the one posting the BHSI site as an example of reasonable information. It's deceitful of you to post it and then refuse to defend it.
yes, and I was pointing out how both buzz and the bhsi contradict themselves. something both turn a blind eye to
Originally Posted by
RazrSkutr
Surely you've conducted a painstaking examination of the BHSI site (from the standpoint of your extensive statistical training) with an eye to being able to point out the particularly choice bits ... like their support for TRT's 85% for example?
that's another fib Randy tells. He admits the 85% figure is wrong and has been admitted to be so by the authors, but he continues to perpetrate it.
Can you trust someone like that?