Originally Posted by
closetbiker
Not certain as to direct monetary contributions, but there certainly is indirect monetary contributions as well as mechandise provided and the Bell logo displayed, but even without direct involvement, it's obvious that Bell stands to gain significantly from mandatory laws, no?
Maybe not if it decreases ridership, like you claim, no? Perhaps Bell would stand to gain more if there were no MHL and ridership was up more than it would be with MHL, like y'all claim, no?