View Single Post
Old 03-15-12 | 06:53 PM
  #18  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by cyccommute
Given the severity of the bend on the fork, you aren't looking at a "dent" in the downtube but a buckling of the tube itself. Nothing 'hit' the tube to dent it but, rather, the tube tried to fold upon impact ......
This is a nice theory, except that it disregards all the physical evidence. The shape of the dent shows that it's a dent, and not a buckle. Moreover it's precise alignment with the fender brace, stretches credulity as a coincidence. What almost certainly happened is the fork pushed back pushing the wheel into the downtube with the fender brace trapped between them.

In any case, when downtubes buckle from front impacts it's almost always at the bottom directly behind the headtube. The reuslting buckles have a characteristic appearance (clearly a buckle) which this frame doesn't.

As far as safety goes, without any repair at all this frame has a decent chance of outlasting it's owner, and if and when it fails will give generous notice.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply