To my knowledge nobody in the US, continental Europe, or Japan has made a "criterium bike" since the mid-1970s. I'm not even sure if there was ever any agreement on what constituted a "crit bike." Certainly, many frames were labeled or marketed as such, but few showed all the features--high bottom bracket, steep angles, and short fork rake--on the same bike. For example, Raleigh Pros had very high bottom brackets but pretty standard angles and fork rakes. My Charles Roberts frames had moderate bottom bracket drop, slightly short fork rakes, and standard 73-degree angles. My '79 Gios was clearly an Italian frame made for export to the US--it had a low bottom bracket per the CONI manual, a standard fork rake, but angles on the steep side of conventional. It was definitely not the same model Roger DeVlaeminck was winning the spring classics on.

I remember a few--a buddy's custom Tanguay that looked like a track bike with road dropouts, another friend's Marinoni with a suspiciously high bottom bracket, and a showroom full of frames that Ben Serotta made before he started equipping the 7-Eleven team with his interpretation of a standard Italian road bike. "Crit bikes" went out of fashion when duffers like me noticed that the guys winning criteriums were doing it on standard road bikes.

Nowadays, below the top tube, road bikes are pretty much based on the standard road racing bike of the late 70s, sized down a centimeter or two--71.5-74 degree head angles, 65-70 mm bottom bracket drop, and 43-45 cm fork offset.