Old 07-02-13 | 06:52 PM
  #18  
gyozadude's Avatar
gyozadude
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
From: Sunnyvale, California

Bikes: Bridgestone RB-1, 600, T700, MB-6 w/ Dirt Drops, MB-Zip, Bianchi Limited, Nashbar Hounder

Originally Posted by Burton
At the last tech seminar, I asked the guys at Shimano why they used those 'stupid pins' instead of a quick link system. I was told they tested different quick link systems for years and couldn't come up with anything that didn't compromise the strength of the chain by becoming 'the weakest link'. The oversized pin approach apparently doesn't have that problem.

The numbers I was quoted were 'the quick links wore up to 30% faster than the rest of the chain'.
Deja Vu. I swear I read something recently somewhere on exactly this thing about great wear on master links. So was was balancing the cost between bulk Shimano replacement pins (segmented type with break-off tip) and the master link. And I think I got a bulk price on some Shimano 10 speed and other speed for like $1.50 in groups of 25 or 50. I think you can get them for around $11 for a bag of 5 pins still. While retail for a 10 spd master link was like $2 in a 6 pack/card. So the price isn't all that much different, and if the life span of the master link is only 30% less, then not a big deal. I could either replace it for an extra $2 or so and use the chain for 30% longer. Or I could just replace the chain, since I'm likely to replace it anyway. But what could really make the master link a better value is that for the life of me, I can find my chains and master links in one of my parts bins. But where are my bulk Shimano link pins? I recall organizing my inventory in the garage and not finding any, well maybe an older 8 or 9 speed link pin. And it's not like I stock a lot of shimano chains either. But losing that many chain pins is a dumb mistake. It could still be somewhere, but we moved across town last year, and I'm still missing stuff.
gyozadude is offline  
Reply