Originally Posted by
sstorkel
Sadly, I wasn't able to find online versions of
any study that supports your conclusion. The best I could do was
this discussion which points out flaws in the two most commonly talked about studies. As expected, these studies used a
minuscule number of cyclists among other problems (ex: testing at ridiculously low power outputs). FWIW, I also found
this summary which claims that "clipless pedals allowed a greater muscular activity, a greater efficiency index, and better muscular coordination" during sprints.
I see, so you don't bother to read the studies, cite a third party who may (or may not) have read those studies and may (or may not) have been qualified to make such comments, yet since they appear to support your preconceptions and personal beliefs they must be more legitimate that two peer reviewed journal articles...
Ok. No problem, continue with your faith in your placebo.
Originally Posted by
sstorkel
Your shoe doesn't appear to be especially more stylish than the SPD-compatible
Shimano MT-31 or the
Specialized Tahoe, in my opinion. Hard to imagine they work well for hiking: the tread seems unsuited to anything other than sidewalks or well-packed, relatively flat trails.
Style is an athestics question, and frankly not one I place much credence in coming from someone who undoubtedly accompanies their SPD shoes with spandex. As to working well hiking, I have put over a one hundred miles on my last pair hiking the four corners area. Of course, I wasn't carrying a forty pound pack with them, which a cycle tourist seldom will either. Regardless, they are infinitely more comfortable for walking, hiking, etc.. than SPD compatible shoes. Which is likely why those who use those contraptions so often also pack a spare pair of shoes for off bike...