View Single Post
Old 10-31-13 | 10:50 AM
  #181  
acidfast7
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,543
Likes: 41
From: England / CPH

Bikes: 2010 Cube Acid / 2013 Mango FGSS

Originally Posted by Phil_gretz
You know, acidfast7, I've re-read the thread and better understand what you're trying to show with this experiment. I think that my last response was over the top, and I apologize for the challenging tone that it took. My bad.

Your question was whether the original owner could really tell the difference between seemingly similar bikes...and I think that I'd respond "it depends". Sometimes the differences between how the bikes are set up (whether hubs are binding, or whether the chain line is off) can create a perceptible difference.

And further, much depends on the sensitivity and experience of the rider - at least in terms of the subjective aspects of whether a bike feels "lively" or "responsive". I know that I can tell the difference between the feel of bikes that I own and ride on the road. I have another bike, a middle-of-the-road 1980s road bike, that has really nice sealed bearing hubs laced to original rims. It is a joy to ride. I can't explain it - it's not the frame, per se, but the combination that is out of this world...

Anyway, I hope that you enjoy your bike and continue to get satisfactory use from it. I'd be interested if you do have component wear or other issues that crop up with its continued use.

Again, sorry about the combative tone. It wasn't called for. Phil G.
It's OK. No need to apologise.

I usually quite an a-hole on BF, so I'm the last person to whom anyone should apologise.

I have a photo after every single ride and I'm curious what will wear out first. Perhaps nothing for a very long time because I only ride 20km/day and it seems like I'm doing a lot of traveling so I don't even go to work that many days anymore.
acidfast7 is offline  
Reply