Originally Posted by
erig007
I'm french speaking by the way that explain something. If you want to write in french i don't mind.
Attacking the author is a well known fallacy technique but it doesn't change the facts.
Your argument : I can't write chaffing properly therefore what i say is false ==> fallacy
By the way, i'm using a conventional saddle but on a medical standpoint from what i know noseless saddles are above and beyond conventional one unless you know something that i don't.
I knew what you meant. I speak french too but my french spelling would be lacking if you saw it. LOL
Being raised in a French Acadian environment helped me understand your point. Anyway, the theory of a shorter nose is correct for winter riding when you could possibly be wearing at least a thicker layer. It is not common knowledge so most would just discount that and it's understandable but you are right and the explanation you provided from those studies are good to know stuff. The Brooks B17S is a good choice for winter riding because it has a shorter nose and is designed primarily for women but it's very comfy for men too. I also have a "Ride Out Carbon Comfort" saddle that has a very short nose and is great for winter and year round really.