Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Winter Cycling
Reload this Page >

Best winter saddle

Search
Notices
Winter Cycling Don't let snow and ice discourage you this winter. The key element to year-round cycling is proper attire! Check out this winter cycling forum to chat with other ice bike fanatics.

Best winter saddle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-13 | 06:10 PM
  #26  
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 70
Likes: 35
From: Wisconsin, USA

Bikes: Felt F65, Trek FX 7.3, Centurion Professional

I've never heard of anyone having such problems with saddles. I ride 12,000/year and I use the same saddle whatever the weather. No pains, no saddle sores, and no problems. I prefer a Fizik Arione, but that's just me.
marathon marke is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-13 | 07:19 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 1
From: 6367 km away from the center of the Earth
Originally Posted by prooftheory
There is another thing that doesn't seem obvious to me because I have never experienced the problem. Is it really the case that having the thick snow pants over bibs actually creates significantly more chafing? I think this would be a reason to avoid them if possible.
I would say i don't know.
What i know to have experienced it is the opposite to Sheldon Brown's citation in the previous posts: my summer saddle that i chose on purpose with the widest nose possible without generating chaffing is very comfy during summer but doesn't fit well in winter when i have to add layers. So that i switch to my winter saddle when winter comes. The extra layers that come with winter on my summer saddle generate the same feeling than having thick misplaced seams.

Last edited by erig007; 11-24-13 at 08:02 PM.
erig007 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-24-13 | 07:25 PM
  #28  
prooftheory's Avatar
pro in someone's theory
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 3
From: Las Cruces, NM

Bikes: FTP

So your answer is that they do not create a problem as long as the saddle nose is narrow enough? Good to know.
prooftheory is offline  
Reply
Old 11-25-13 | 11:05 AM
  #29  
ThermionicScott's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 22,676
Likes: 2,642
From: CID

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

I still think there is far more to it than the nose width. The "sitting area" toward the rear can take any shape from convex, to flat, to channelled, in an effort to please every person out there. I tried a Brooks Pro last year, and just couldn't get along with the rounded top despite the fact that the width of the nose and rear sections were perfect for me -- I switched to narrower B17Ns and B5Ns, and the flatter top agrees much more with my perineum. Perhaps what erig007 is getting with saddles that have a maximum nose width are saddles with the right amount of width in the rear to support his sitbones.

I dug through the sq-lab collection of abstracts, and found it interesting (but not surprising) that many of them contradict. The natural tendency in that situation is to favor any that bolster your worldview. I was able to come away satisfied that if my saddle doesn't cause numbness or pain, and that I rose off the saddle occasionally while riding, that I shouldn't have any significant or long-lasting problems. Cool.
ThermionicScott is offline  
Reply
Old 12-02-13 | 06:21 PM
  #30  
droy45's Avatar
tougher than a boiled owl
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
From: Rocky Coast of Maine

Bikes: Fetish Cycles Fixation / Fuji S12S / Gary Fisher MTB / Raleigh Grand Prix / Ross Professional / Kent comfort cruiser

Originally Posted by erig007
I'm french speaking by the way that explain something. If you want to write in french i don't mind.
Attacking the author is a well known fallacy technique but it doesn't change the facts.

Your argument : I can't write chaffing properly therefore what i say is false ==> fallacy

By the way, i'm using a conventional saddle but on a medical standpoint from what i know noseless saddles are above and beyond conventional one unless you know something that i don't.
I knew what you meant. I speak french too but my french spelling would be lacking if you saw it. LOL
Being raised in a French Acadian environment helped me understand your point. Anyway, the theory of a shorter nose is correct for winter riding when you could possibly be wearing at least a thicker layer. It is not common knowledge so most would just discount that and it's understandable but you are right and the explanation you provided from those studies are good to know stuff. The Brooks B17S is a good choice for winter riding because it has a shorter nose and is designed primarily for women but it's very comfy for men too. I also have a "Ride Out Carbon Comfort" saddle that has a very short nose and is great for winter and year round really.
droy45 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lasauge
Classic & Vintage
10
09-14-23 09:46 AM
yashinon
Road Cycling
23
05-03-18 06:44 PM
qandaappraisals
General Cycling Discussion
12
01-14-17 10:00 PM
xtrajack
Winter Cycling
8
12-01-13 02:25 AM
Roll-Monroe-Co
Classic & Vintage
10
05-16-12 09:24 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.