View Single Post
Old 02-09-14 | 01:39 PM
  #30  
OldsCOOL's Avatar
OldsCOOL
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 13,358
Likes: 665
From: northern michigan

Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712

Originally Posted by BluesDawg
I understood that. I was pointing out that even with a 50/13 you would still have as high a gear ratio as with the 53/14. Slightly higher, in fact. A 50/12 would give you the higher gear you seem to want (you didn't indicate that before). The 50/11 would be such a big increase over what you had, I wonder if it would be usable. In either case, the 34/28 will give you a much lower gear than your old 39/28.
See the comparison here.

7 speeds on compact gearing makes for some hard decisions. If you go for more range than you really need, the price paid is very large jumps between gears. 10 speed rear ends is what made it possible to really get the most out of compact gearing. As long as you are upgrading...
Yeah, compromises galore. I'm glad for the selection. The 11-28 looked good primarily for keeping the 28 and much less so for that 11. All I need is a bit more topend than what my oldschool stuff gives me. Spring bike build will have the final say. And I need to lose 10Lbs, too.
OldsCOOL is offline  
Reply