View Single Post
Old 04-11-14 | 10:09 AM
  #5  
xifias
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
so..

i used the calculator on the competitive cyclist as shown.these are the results

EDDY FIT
Top Tube Length 55 - 55.4 Cm
Seat Tube Range CC 52.7 - 53.2 Cm
Seat Tube Range CT 54.3 - 54.8 Cm
Stem Length 9.7 - 10.3 Cm
BB Saddle Position 75.4 - 77.4 Cm
Saddle Handlebar 52.3 - 52.9 Cm
Saddle Setback 3.3 - 3.7 Cm
Seatpost Type Not Setback

COMPETITIVE FIT
Top Tube Length 55 - 55.4 Cm
Seat Tube Range CC 51.5 - 52 Cm
Seat Tube Range CT 53.1 - 53.6 Cm
Stem Length 10.8 - 11.4 Cm
BB Saddle Position 76.2 - 78.2 Cm
Saddle Handlebar 51.5 - 52.1 Cm
Saddle Setback 2.1 - 2.5 Cm
Seatpost Type Not Setback

FRENCH FIT
Top Tube Length 56.2 - 56.6 Cm
Seat Tube Range CC 54.4 - 54.9 Cm
Seat Tube Range CT 56 - 56.5 Cm
Stem Length 9.9 - 10.5 Cm
BB Saddle Position 73.7 - 75.7 Cm
Saddle Handlebar 54 - 54.6 Cm
Saddle Setback 2.8 - 3.2 Cm
Seatpost Type Setback

so what do you think about now?it seems that if a 55,4cm top tube frame with a 10cm stem is ideal for me,then a 57,5cm frame with an 8cm stem will do the job,but a little more twitchy and nervous steering due to the shorter length of the stem.am i right?or is it completely wrong that assumption?

i apologise for my english but its not my native language!
xifias is offline  
Reply