View Single Post
Old 07-21-14 | 06:11 PM
  #7  
MikeWMass
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 730
Likes: 107
From: western Massachusetts (greater Springfield area)

Bikes: Velosolex St. Tropez, LeMond Zurich (spine bike), Rotator swb recumbent

Originally Posted by FBinNY
What you're doing wrong is confusing causes and effects.

I don't know for sure why the new chain tended to autoshift, which could be related to worn sprockets, the shape of the chain's inner plates, FD adjustment, BB play, frame flex, or warped chainringds (for starters), but assuredly was not caused by the chain being too long. The length of the chain in the upper loop is fixed, and the tension is proportional to haw hard you pedal, having nothing to do with resting tension.

As for the "slack" when back pedaling. This again has nothing directly to do with chain length or tension. You get slack in the upper loop because of friction in the freehub or the chain running through the cassette and RD pulley system. The slack or sag happens because the crank is spooling the chain back faster than the rear drive will take it, and the chain is therefore transferring from the RD cage to the upper loop. The specific causes vary, and the source of the friction can be any or a combination.

So, stop fretting about the chain length. It was OK before, and as long as you measured big/big+1" minimum, it's OK now.
I agree in principle with this, and especially with the last statement that if it worked OK at the same length before, the length should be ok now. However, if the chain should be way too long, there will be slack somewhere, and it will be on the run from the driving to the driven sprocket (the chainrings are sprockets, after all, at least for the purposes of this discussion). When you are pedaling, the slack will be on the bottom, when back pedaling, it will be on the top, as no system is frictionless. In my limited experience with this, the chain has to be quite a bit too long to cause skipping or jumping, though.
MikeWMass is offline  
Reply