Problem with new chain
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 1
From: ?
Bikes: i may have bike(s)
Problem with new chain
I just replaced the chain on a used Trek Cobia. I didn’t have any problems with the old chain in terms of shifting.
I took off the old chain and counted links, to my surprise it was the length of a brand new KMC chain that I used to replace it. I put on the new chain, uncut and found that out of the saddle pedaling when in the middle chainring caused the chain to move around enough that it jumped onto another chainring.
I took off the chain, used the big chainring/big rear cog method (not through the derailler) and this warranted cutting off only about 5 links. So I did that. Now, when I back pedal, the chain is slack enough that it hits the chainstay. Overall the chain just looks too long.
What am I doing wrong here?
Thanks
I took off the old chain and counted links, to my surprise it was the length of a brand new KMC chain that I used to replace it. I put on the new chain, uncut and found that out of the saddle pedaling when in the middle chainring caused the chain to move around enough that it jumped onto another chainring.
I took off the chain, used the big chainring/big rear cog method (not through the derailler) and this warranted cutting off only about 5 links. So I did that. Now, when I back pedal, the chain is slack enough that it hits the chainstay. Overall the chain just looks too long.
What am I doing wrong here?
Thanks
#2
Senior Member


Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
What you're doing wrong is confusing causes and effects.
I don't know for sure why the new chain tended to autoshift, which could be related to worn sprockets, the shape of the chain's inner plates, FD adjustment, BB play, frame flex, or warped chainringds (for starters), but assuredly was not caused by the chain being too long. The length of the chain in the upper loop is fixed, and the tension is proportional to haw hard you pedal, having nothing to do with resting tension.
As for the "slack" when back pedaling. This again has nothing directly to do with chain length or tension. You get slack in the upper loop because of friction in the freehub or the chain running through the cassette and RD pulley system. The slack or sag happens because the crank is spooling the chain back faster than the rear drive will take it, and the chain is therefore transferring from the RD cage to the upper loop. The specific causes vary, and the source of the friction can be any or a combination.
So, stop fretting about the chain length. It was OK before, and as long as you measured big/big+1" minimum, it's OK now.
Deal with your backpedaling issue by observing and detecting the source of friction in those items I described earlier.
I don't know for sure why the new chain tended to autoshift, which could be related to worn sprockets, the shape of the chain's inner plates, FD adjustment, BB play, frame flex, or warped chainringds (for starters), but assuredly was not caused by the chain being too long. The length of the chain in the upper loop is fixed, and the tension is proportional to haw hard you pedal, having nothing to do with resting tension.
As for the "slack" when back pedaling. This again has nothing directly to do with chain length or tension. You get slack in the upper loop because of friction in the freehub or the chain running through the cassette and RD pulley system. The slack or sag happens because the crank is spooling the chain back faster than the rear drive will take it, and the chain is therefore transferring from the RD cage to the upper loop. The specific causes vary, and the source of the friction can be any or a combination.
So, stop fretting about the chain length. It was OK before, and as long as you measured big/big+1" minimum, it's OK now.
Deal with your backpedaling issue by observing and detecting the source of friction in those items I described earlier.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#4
All Campy All The Time


Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 124
From: Richmond, Virginia
Bikes: Listed in my signature.
Some Shimano rear derailleurs have a small tab extending across the pulley cage just below the top pulley. It's real easy to install the chain on the wrong side of the tab, and when it is installed that way things don't work right.
__________________
My C&V Bikes:
1972 Bottecchia Professional, 1972 Legnano Olympiade Record,
1982 Colnago Super, 1987 Bottecchia Team C-Record,
1988 Pinarello Montello, 1990 Masi Nuova Strada Super Record,
1995 Bianchi Campione d'Italia, 1995 DeBernardi Thron
My C&V Bikes:
1972 Bottecchia Professional, 1972 Legnano Olympiade Record,
1982 Colnago Super, 1987 Bottecchia Team C-Record,
1988 Pinarello Montello, 1990 Masi Nuova Strada Super Record,
1995 Bianchi Campione d'Italia, 1995 DeBernardi Thron
#6
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 1
From: ?
Bikes: i may have bike(s)
OKay, I am not trying to be contrarian, truly, but I notice on my road bikes the chain is not nearly as slack over the chain stays. Sitting here, the mtn bike chain is in the front middle ring and middle-ish rear cog and the chain is nearly touching the chain stay, maybe two cm away at the closest point of contact.
#7
Senior Member

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 730
Likes: 107
From: western Massachusetts (greater Springfield area)
Bikes: Velosolex St. Tropez, LeMond Zurich (spine bike), Rotator swb recumbent
What you're doing wrong is confusing causes and effects.
I don't know for sure why the new chain tended to autoshift, which could be related to worn sprockets, the shape of the chain's inner plates, FD adjustment, BB play, frame flex, or warped chainringds (for starters), but assuredly was not caused by the chain being too long. The length of the chain in the upper loop is fixed, and the tension is proportional to haw hard you pedal, having nothing to do with resting tension.
As for the "slack" when back pedaling. This again has nothing directly to do with chain length or tension. You get slack in the upper loop because of friction in the freehub or the chain running through the cassette and RD pulley system. The slack or sag happens because the crank is spooling the chain back faster than the rear drive will take it, and the chain is therefore transferring from the RD cage to the upper loop. The specific causes vary, and the source of the friction can be any or a combination.
So, stop fretting about the chain length. It was OK before, and as long as you measured big/big+1" minimum, it's OK now.
I don't know for sure why the new chain tended to autoshift, which could be related to worn sprockets, the shape of the chain's inner plates, FD adjustment, BB play, frame flex, or warped chainringds (for starters), but assuredly was not caused by the chain being too long. The length of the chain in the upper loop is fixed, and the tension is proportional to haw hard you pedal, having nothing to do with resting tension.
As for the "slack" when back pedaling. This again has nothing directly to do with chain length or tension. You get slack in the upper loop because of friction in the freehub or the chain running through the cassette and RD pulley system. The slack or sag happens because the crank is spooling the chain back faster than the rear drive will take it, and the chain is therefore transferring from the RD cage to the upper loop. The specific causes vary, and the source of the friction can be any or a combination.
So, stop fretting about the chain length. It was OK before, and as long as you measured big/big+1" minimum, it's OK now.
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay, FL
Bikes: Surly Cross-Check, Torker U-District
OKay, I am not trying to be contrarian, truly, but I notice on my road bikes the chain is not nearly as slack over the chain stays. Sitting here, the mtn bike chain is in the front middle ring and middle-ish rear cog and the chain is nearly touching the chain stay, maybe two cm away at the closest point of contact.
#9
Senior Member


Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
I agree in principle with this, and especially with the last statement that if it worked OK at the same length before, the length should be ok now. However, if the chain should be way too long, there will be slack somewhere, and it will be on the run from the driving to the driven sprocket (the chainrings are sprockets, after all, at least for the purposes of this discussion). When you are pedaling, the slack will be on the bottom, when back pedaling, it will be on the top, as no system is frictionless. In my limited experience with this, the chain has to be quite a bit too long to cause skipping or jumping, though.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#12
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 1
From: ?
Bikes: i may have bike(s)
The friction issue makes sense if I was backpedaling say, but there is no tension in the system and the chain moves easily right now pushing back on the pedals.
How do I check the derailleur spring? Again, I have not noticed any shifting issues other than major cross-chaining, i.e. big - big doesn’t really happen without a lot of fuss if at all.
(thanks)
How do I check the derailleur spring? Again, I have not noticed any shifting issues other than major cross-chaining, i.e. big - big doesn’t really happen without a lot of fuss if at all.
(thanks)
#13
Senior Member


Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
The friction issue makes sense if I was backpedaling say, but there is no tension in the system and the chain moves easily right now pushing back on the pedals.
How do I check the derailleur spring? Again, I have not noticed any shifting issues other than major cross-chaining, i.e. big - big doesn’t really happen without a lot of fuss if at all.
(thanks)
How do I check the derailleur spring? Again, I have not noticed any shifting issues other than major cross-chaining, i.e. big - big doesn’t really happen without a lot of fuss if at all.
(thanks)
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#14
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 1
From: ?
Bikes: i may have bike(s)
Update: still not fixed!
Something is definitely wrong as my road bike (Ultegra) does not exhibit this behavior. I have backed out the pulley screws (previously quick cleaned them) to make sure they weren't overtightened to no avail. The spring seems to operate correctly as far as I can tell. Im starting to wonder about the derailleur though. I double checked the big big length method of the chain and so what else could it be?
I am starting to get like another poster on BF: simply swapping chains should be a 10 min job, which for me takes well now hours/days and still not resolved! To think, I used to rebuild engines but now I simply don't have the patience/time.
Something is definitely wrong as my road bike (Ultegra) does not exhibit this behavior. I have backed out the pulley screws (previously quick cleaned them) to make sure they weren't overtightened to no avail. The spring seems to operate correctly as far as I can tell. Im starting to wonder about the derailleur though. I double checked the big big length method of the chain and so what else could it be?
I am starting to get like another poster on BF: simply swapping chains should be a 10 min job, which for me takes well now hours/days and still not resolved! To think, I used to rebuild engines but now I simply don't have the patience/time.
#15
Senior Member


Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Update: still not fixed!
Something is definitely wrong as my road bike (Ultegra) does not exhibit this behavior. I have backed out the pulley screws (previously quick cleaned them) to make sure they weren't overtightened to no avail. The spring seems to operate correctly as far as I can tell. Im starting to wonder about the derailleur though. I double checked the big big length method of the chain and so what else could it be?
I am starting to get like another poster on BF: simply swapping chains should be a 10 min job, which for me takes well now hours/days and still not resolved! To think, I used to rebuild engines but now I simply don't have the patience/time.
Something is definitely wrong as my road bike (Ultegra) does not exhibit this behavior. I have backed out the pulley screws (previously quick cleaned them) to make sure they weren't overtightened to no avail. The spring seems to operate correctly as far as I can tell. Im starting to wonder about the derailleur though. I double checked the big big length method of the chain and so what else could it be?
I am starting to get like another poster on BF: simply swapping chains should be a 10 min job, which for me takes well now hours/days and still not resolved! To think, I used to rebuild engines but now I simply don't have the patience/time.

You're failing diagnostics 101 and listening to too many people. Chainring auto-shifting which is what you originally described is NEVER caused by the RD (except sometimes when backpedaling) because the upper loop runs directly from the top of the rear sprocket to the chainring.
So, go back to my my first post (no.2) and review, ft derailleur adjustment, or look for a loose BB, or a damaged tooth on the chainring for starters.
One thing you might look at is how the chain meshes with the teeth. Look down from the top through the FD cage and the chain to see if the tips of the about to engage teeth are coming up into the center of the plate gap, or touching the sides of the inner plates. Think of a ferryboat coming smoothly into the slip vs. coming in at an angle and bumping down the sides of the slip, and think of the sprocket's teeth the same way.
Another possible factor, is chain lube. Well oiled chains will slide smoothly down the sides of the teeth even when there's some rubbing, but poorer lube can make a chain not engage smoothly, and once it begins to ride up on the teeth it's derail.
So my advice is simple, look for the problem where it is (at the chainrings) and stop fretting about unrelated stuff at the RD.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#16
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 1
From: ?
Bikes: i may have bike(s)
Haha...love it. I should have mentioned that the autoshift issue occurred when out of the saddle rocking the bike back and forth with some gusto.
Ft. derailleur puts chain dead center, part of the derailleur even covers the larger chainring so that the chain shouldn't jump there. Ferryboat looks to be coming in dead center captain.
Okay, some teeth on each chainring are looking as if they got a chunk taken out of them. They look like they need to be replaced.
The chain is basically new.
Even with the chainrings needing replacement, the sag in the chain is not correct. None of my other bikes exhibit this. It is as if the rear derailleur is not pulling on the chain enough to take up the slack even though the spring seems to be okay as per the post above.
Yeah, I think you are right with your opening statement.
Ft. derailleur puts chain dead center, part of the derailleur even covers the larger chainring so that the chain shouldn't jump there. Ferryboat looks to be coming in dead center captain.
Okay, some teeth on each chainring are looking as if they got a chunk taken out of them. They look like they need to be replaced.
The chain is basically new.
Even with the chainrings needing replacement, the sag in the chain is not correct. None of my other bikes exhibit this. It is as if the rear derailleur is not pulling on the chain enough to take up the slack even though the spring seems to be okay as per the post above.
Yeah, I think you are right with your opening statement.
Last edited by beatlebee; 07-29-14 at 03:49 PM.
#17
Senior Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 4,400
Likes: 106
From: SF Bay Area
Bikes: Bianchi Infinito (Celeste, of course)
#19
Senior Member


Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Normally, shifting would happen if the FD cage moved over a bit, but instead the crank is probably moving out a bit at the top (compared to the FD cage).
Next time you hammer look down at the chain, ring and front derailleur. You notice movement of the ring compared to the FD cage. If so, that's the problem. The cause is a bit harder. It could be frame flex, crank flex or a loose BB, so you still have some detective work to do.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Last edited by FBinNY; 07-29-14 at 06:34 PM.
#22
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 1
From: ?
Bikes: i may have bike(s)
Final Update:
The rear derailleur is toast. I got fed up and took it to Fairwheel. They immediately noticed that a tab on the derailleur which is involved with spring "windup" was broken/missing. So I decided to upgrade from the x5 to x9.
Cheers to all the help.
The rear derailleur is toast. I got fed up and took it to Fairwheel. They immediately noticed that a tab on the derailleur which is involved with spring "windup" was broken/missing. So I decided to upgrade from the x5 to x9.
Cheers to all the help.






