This is typical of my responses -- I'll point out nonsense and flawed arguments on either side of the helmet issue. You argue that helmets are the way to go, and that's fine, but when you cite sources, very often they don't say what you claim the do, or support helmet use to the level you claim.

Instead of citing individual studies, you typically link to broad, catch-all sites about the issue which contain counterarguments and studies disproving what you are trying to support, along with older, widely discredited research. You're not alone in this -- the barehead brigade also misrepresent sites and citations to serve their needs as well.