View Single Post
Old 12-15-14, 07:14 PM
  #20  
TejanoTrackie 
Veteran Racer
 
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,760

Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1337 Post(s)
Liked 765 Times in 432 Posts
Originally Posted by Leukybear
Wow, that's impressive.
Sure a belt drive can handle torque/ backpedaling no doubt. But a point to keep in mind though is, motorcycle belts are never put through the stresses of abruptly having the powertrain stop entirely during a skid in a snapping motion, then withstanding the inertia of the rear wheel pulling back and the weight/ power of the person pulling forward, often times in quick succession.
Not to mention, motorcycle belts are wider and beefier by design.
I would venture that a motorcycle belt withstands at least a hundredfold the loads of any bicycle belt, even when you include any amplified loads due to sudden impact. My current Harley produces 100 ft-lb peak torque at the rear wheel, and this is sustained loading, not some short peak that lasts a fraction of a second at best. Although the belt on my Harley is wider and no doubt stronger than the ones used on bicycles, I seriously doubt that it is 100X stronger. So, although I know that higher loads may be achieved short term in some skidding situations, I don't believe that you will get anywhere near close to the failure point of the belt, or that the belt will wear out in a lifetime of use.
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

Originally Posted by Dcv
I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
TejanoTrackie is offline