View Single Post
Old 12-31-14 | 11:37 AM
  #83  
jyl's Avatar
jyl
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,643
Likes: 68
From: Portland OR

Bikes: 61 Bianchi Specialissima 71 Peugeot G50 7? P'geot PX10 74 Raleigh GranSport 75 P'geot UO8 78? Raleigh Team Pro 82 P'geot PSV 86 P'geot PX 91 Bridgestone MB0 92 B'stone XO1 97 Rans VRex 92 Cannondale R1000 94 B'stone MB5 97 Vitus 997

Originally Posted by gsa103
One other fit consideration is flexibility. CDR has back issues but has lots of hamstring flexibility, allowing his pelvis to rotate forward and maintain a flat back. The two riders in front are more typical, and have a more vertical pelvis and some spine curvature.

At first glance, your fit dimensions don't seem that abnormal. I'm 6ft with just over 30in pants inseam, and I can find a decent fit on most frames with a 56cm ETT. For those with short legs, compact frames are essential to getting adequate handover. It's not going to be generous, but you can have a cm or two.
I'm 5' 11" with jeans inseam 32", bike inseam 33". My most comfortable road bikes are 58 cm c-t-c. I can just stand over them, with a bit of touchage. The seatposts are pretty low in the seattube, at most a "fistful" of exposed post. I install 130-140 mm stems, sometimes push the saddles rearward. The bars are from level with the saddle or 4" below (level on the commuter, below on the weekend bikes).
jyl is offline  
Reply