View Single Post
Old 02-07-15 | 03:54 PM
  #14  
dddd's Avatar
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,835
Likes: 1,816
From: Northern California

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

I should say that I have no qualms with forcing a wider-spaced rear wheel into the rear triangle, where I expect both sides to flex near-equally!

It's when you do the cold-setting that one side always seems to have a lower "yield point" of force, where if they see equal and opposite force then one side springs back while the other side doesn't. Only in this scenario (what I thought you had earlier described) will a significant to-one-side offset likely result at the rear wheel.

Sometimes such an offset (toward the driveside) of the rear frame can be useful, as when a badly-bent wheel can better be trued with less dish applied, so the assembled bike could then possibly have both a stronger, straighter wheel and perfect wheel tracking at the same time! The chainline might also even improve! And, as I think you implied, what better bike to do it on than one with malleable steel chainstays?
dddd is offline  
Reply