Originally Posted by
prathmann
I wouldn't be surprised if the poll suffered from significant self-selection bias. I've only really had any interest in toe-overlap since I acquired a bike that had that characteristic a number of years ago. Prior to that I would have been unlikely to even open this thread, much less vote in the poll. But now that I have such a bike I'm more interested and did participate in the poll with a 'yes/60cm' vote although all of my previous bikes were in the 'no/>55cm' camp.
I wouldn't be surprised about self-selection bias either, but I also wouldn't be surprised that there is none. This is the data we have, so it is the data I will go with. If you have a better poll, by all means let's get on with it. As for opening the poll not attractive a broad audience of all kinds of folks, I was hoping the title would give us a leg up on that. And then there is me. Lots of folks on the 41 can't resist seeing what complete foolishness I am up to now. They know that I try not to disappoint.
I dunno. It was fun while it lasted. And isn't that what BF is all about?
Bottom line as far as I am concerned based on lots more experience than just this poll is that: Lots of folks have toe overlap. Lots of folks ride in big city traffic. Those two sets must have a major overlap. It can't matter all that much. And I do issue a challenge: prove me wrong!