View Single Post
Old 11-11-15, 11:16 AM
  #7  
1983
Senior Member
 
1983's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 164
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by andr0id
Not enough information....

What kind of spindle would you be trying to be effective to?

Square taper, Octalink, ISIS (haha) double or triple? This type of BB doesn't directly correspond to any of those.

It is most commonly used for a Hollowtech II Shimano road double or triple if that helps.

BTW: the article linked while accurate certainly hypes the new press in bearings.

A 68mm English road BB or a 73mm English Mountain BB will always have a crank available from one of the big 3 mainstream component manufacturers.

Uhh, the spindle that would exist at that length if one was there. The whole "effective" qualifier is really throwing people off.

Originally Posted by HillRider
C for not understanding. There is no "effective spindle length" for these bottom brackets. If you need a number, try 112.7 mm which is the length of the built-in spindle on an FC-5703 105 triple crank measured from the bearing seat to the end of the spindle. Does that help?
C for me or the other poster?

Effective spindle length is a theoretical length, ie of course it doesn't exist. To answer your question, yes the information helps but related to a follow up question rather than the OP. Many thanks either way.

Last edited by 1983; 11-11-15 at 11:20 AM.
1983 is offline