shimano bb-5700 effective spindle length
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
BB-5700 is only a pair of external bearing cups and has no spindle. The spindle is built into the drive side crank arm of Hollowtech II cranks and they are available in double and triple formats.
#3
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,883
Likes: 10
From: Southern Ontario
Road Bike Action | The Bottom Bracket Breakdown
Notes: The most ‘standard’ bottom bracket shell width is currently 68mm. Once the external cups are installed, it measures out to 86mm wide.
Notes: The most ‘standard’ bottom bracket shell width is currently 68mm. Once the external cups are installed, it measures out to 86mm wide.
#5
"effective spindle length" means what the spindle length would be if there was a spindle. The question was not whether this external bearing has a spindle. A for effort.
@Slash5 - many thanks.
@Slash5 - many thanks.
Not enough information....
What kind of spindle would you be trying to be effective to?
Square taper, Octalink, ISIS (haha) double or triple? This type of BB doesn't directly correspond to any of those.
It is most commonly used for a Hollowtech II Shimano road double or triple if that helps.
BTW: the article linked while accurate certainly hypes the new press in bearings.
A 68mm English road BB or a 73mm English Mountain BB will always have a crank available from one of the big 3 mainstream component manufacturers.
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,657
Likes: 1,119
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
C for not understanding. There is no "effective spindle length" for these bottom brackets. If you need a number, try 112.7 mm which is the length of the built-in spindle on an FC-5703 105 triple crank measured from the bearing seat to the end of the spindle. Does that help?
#7
Not enough information....
What kind of spindle would you be trying to be effective to?
Square taper, Octalink, ISIS (haha) double or triple? This type of BB doesn't directly correspond to any of those.
It is most commonly used for a Hollowtech II Shimano road double or triple if that helps.
BTW: the article linked while accurate certainly hypes the new press in bearings.
A 68mm English road BB or a 73mm English Mountain BB will always have a crank available from one of the big 3 mainstream component manufacturers.
What kind of spindle would you be trying to be effective to?
Square taper, Octalink, ISIS (haha) double or triple? This type of BB doesn't directly correspond to any of those.
It is most commonly used for a Hollowtech II Shimano road double or triple if that helps.
BTW: the article linked while accurate certainly hypes the new press in bearings.
A 68mm English road BB or a 73mm English Mountain BB will always have a crank available from one of the big 3 mainstream component manufacturers.
Uhh, the spindle that would exist at that length if one was there. The whole "effective" qualifier is really throwing people off.
C for not understanding. There is no "effective spindle length" for these bottom brackets. If you need a number, try 112.7 mm which is the length of the built-in spindle on an FC-5703 105 triple crank measured from the bearing seat to the end of the spindle. Does that help?
Effective spindle length is a theoretical length, ie of course it doesn't exist. To answer your question, yes the information helps but related to a follow up question rather than the OP. Many thanks either way.
Last edited by 1983; 11-11-15 at 11:20 AM.
#8
Banned
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,585
Likes: 6,538
From: TN
Your question was poorly conceived and your snarky f/u was unwarranted. With that said, maybe if you just explained your issue (use this crank with this bike or whatever) a helpful reply would not be hindered by your lack of proper terminology.
#9
Ehhhh, sure thing there, junior. I'll try to consult you next time.
#11
Banned.
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 434
Likes: 2
Shimano's exploded view of this part, which one could hope had the desired information, is, by mistake, the same as the front chainwheel's, findable at SHIMANO Dealer's Manual / User's Manual
#12
Full Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 242
Likes: 3
I have a 5700 laying here, but can't figure out where exactly OP wants measurement from.
If measured from the center of the spindle's splined clamping area on non-driveside to the theoretical center of where the spindle is pressed into the driveside arm, it would be asymmetrical from centerline. The non-driveside spindle clamping area is wider than the driveside's pressed interface.
I believe on more modern 5800 version (and 6800), the driveside is even shallower and more asymmetrical (designed with crankarm face being flatter for more shoe/heel clearance)...but I'd have to take one off to measure.
If measured from the center of the spindle's splined clamping area on non-driveside to the theoretical center of where the spindle is pressed into the driveside arm, it would be asymmetrical from centerline. The non-driveside spindle clamping area is wider than the driveside's pressed interface.
I believe on more modern 5800 version (and 6800), the driveside is even shallower and more asymmetrical (designed with crankarm face being flatter for more shoe/heel clearance)...but I'd have to take one off to measure.
#13
Licensed Bike Geek

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 93
From: Los Barriles, Baja Sur, Mexico
Bikes: Look 585, Kirk Terraplane, Serotta Ottrott, Spectrum Super Custom, Hampsten Carbon Leger Tournesol





