It is a confusing and inconsistently applied law, or set of laws. I believe in my state (North Carolina), e-bikes do not meet the state's definition of "motorized vehicle," and so are basically allowed where ever bikes are allowed.

And while I don't have a problem with this policy, I'm not advocating for the illegal use of e-bikes. I just feel like if someone feels like that's the best way for them to get around, and they're doing it legally, then all this fussing is really just a waste of time. If you care that much how someone else gets around, you might want to pick up another hobby or two to fill your excess free time.

If e-bikes are doing real harm somewhere, just by their nature, that's another issue. But what I seem to be reading here is a lot of people who are simply offended that it doesn't meet their definition of bike touring. I will say that if I really considered it, it might not meet my definition of bike touring. But I don't have an e-bike, so I don't really have to consider it, and I don't really care how other people choose to get around.