View Single Post
Old 01-12-17 | 09:32 PM
  #7  
HTupolev
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 4,272
Likes: 1,304
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by seau grateau
In my experience, threadless adapter can wind up being heavier than a quill setup
I'd expect them to. The major weight disadvantage that quill stems have is the expander and redundant tubing in the steering tube area. Quill stems manage to make a little of that weight disadvantage back by not having a connector at the top of the steering column.
From a structural point of view, adapters are the worst of both worlds: you still have to have the wedge expander and a bunch of tubing overlap within the steerer, and you need to have the connection between stem and adapter up above the headset.

I suppose it's theoretically possible that advancements in manufacturing could allow the sum to weigh less than available classic-style quill stems; but in terms of the basic configuration choices, the adapter setup should be heavier than classic quill.

But, I also don't have data for comparison.
HTupolev is offline  
Reply