View Single Post
Old 02-20-17 | 12:36 PM
  #3  
wschruba
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 103
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
[...]I'm thinking there's a reason why those cam actuated brakes never caught on.
Yeah, the performance was generally terrible as the pads wore. It you didn't constantly adjust the pads in, they were unreliable as a performance brake. It didn't help that, for some ungodly reason, manufacturers decided to put the roller brakes (and u-brakes) mounted beneath the chainstay.

Cantilevers, while they have a similar issue, are nowhere near as bad.

Extra wear parts, higher maintenance, little gain...same thing that killed "parallel push" v-brakes. The cams that they use now in hydraulics work great to maintain a larger pad gap, while avoiding the drawback of pad gapping that mechanically-actuated brakes have.

[MENTION=21434]chizlr40[/MENTION] if you decide that the brakes are too much trouble to get working satisfactorily, u-brakes can be used in lieu of roller brakes with little-to-no modification.
wschruba is offline  
Reply