Originally Posted by
I-Like-To-Bike
I get it, you do not like to argue (i.e. support/validate) statements you make about relative "risk level" based on what ever raw numbers you can find or risk definitions that you fabricate on the fly. I also have no doubt you can find other equally snarky posters who can decide the same about making risk evaluation conclusions based on equally flaky/shaky evidence.
Whatever you say.
However, to be perfectly clear, I don't like pointless arguments. Any pointless arguments, but especially with those people who revel in them.
You in particular, seem to enjoy attacking others, or claiming they lack evidence, but I don't recall many examples (actually any examples, but leaving an out) where you offer up anything by way of evidence yourself.
So feel free to post your strawmen, and I'll feel free to ignore them.