View Single Post
Old 09-07-17 | 05:06 AM
  #133  
rpenmanparker's Avatar
rpenmanparker
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 28,682
Likes: 63
From: Houston, TX

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Originally Posted by johngwheeler
This point is actually more relevant than the weight distribution, and is what I understand by "balance" - a neutral position that you can maintain without effort and various levels of exertion and body posture. It doesn't necessarily mean that weight is equally distributed between bars, saddle & pedals in some perfect equilibrium. What we're trying to achieve is a stable and comfortable cycling position that *allows* for shifts in weight distribution without upsetting the position or compromising comfort.

My whole investigation into this subject has been based on trying to get comfortable primarily, whilst maintaining reasonable performance.
Well said. Guess what. That is what everyone wants. Bringing in the word balance as generally misunderstood by the public is a "schtick". A gimmick. Just set yourself up according to KOPS and see how you like it. Move back. Move forward. You will quickly get where you want your saddle to be. Then work on your reach. It ain't rocket science.
rpenmanparker is offline  
Reply