Originally Posted by
Pendergast
I posted 3 links earlier in the thread to studies that showed calculated calorie counts aren't the whole story when it comes to useable calories for food. Here's one of them(a 32% discrepancy between calculated calories and useable calories for almonds): http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/96/2/296
Nuts seem to be the most affected by the inadequacy of calculated calories to capture the real digestive calorie content of foods, but I would not be surprised if it's significant enough with other foods to make a difference for people who are pure calorie counter dieters.
Even the form of a food can affect available calories. Whole peanuts provide fewer available calories than peanuts that have been turned into peanut butter.
Thank you for the citation! This does point out a significant discrepancy in measured calories vs metabolized calories. I'd love to see if similar discrepancies exist for other unprocessed foods.
This points to a problem with measurement, though, not the overall premise.