View Single Post
Old 10-29-17 | 10:12 PM
  #210  
Doge's Avatar
Doge
Senior Member
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 10,588
Likes: 427
From: Southern California, USA

Bikes: 1979 Raleigh Team 753

Originally Posted by kbarch
That would come as no surprise. People can learn lots of things as matters of record, and Strava records are much more widely published, if you will, than race results. But widely published does not equal important. (Lord knows how many garbage stories on the internet get millions of hits.) In any event, the fact that someone would make a point of filming a KoM attempt necessarily makes it something more than a mere Strava activity. That it happens to be a Strava segment may define its limits or make it recognizable, but it's essentially a coincidence. No doubt there was something notable about the climb or course before anyone marked it as a "segment."

I won't deny that climbing Mt. Ventoux is more of an accomplishment than racing around Central Park, but I just don't see how getting the KoM on the former is any more important than winning the latter if it isn't also part of a race. If Mikel Landa goes out there tomorrow and just happens to get that KoM, a lot of people might notice, but who (besides maybe Laurens ten Dam) would really care?
I guess it just depends. Yes, you are correct, certain segments were special before Strava came along. Mt Palomar. I have times from Lemond, Romenger, Landis. Horner owns the KOM, and it was part of a 100mile ride, before he won the Vuelta that year. Rumor is he was trying to demonstrate he was in shape at 40 and used Strava and that segment to show it.

The Palomar KOM is as good as any amateur race outside nationals.

That race I linked - the Victorville one, had a small field. It was one of my kid's more significant wins and nobody cared. Nobody knew who was there - despite who was there.
A KOM can be pointed to and checked and folks see it and it lasts.
Doge is offline  
Reply