View Single Post
Old 12-26-17 | 02:53 PM
  #8  
Kontact's Avatar
Kontact
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 30 Days
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 12,648
Likes: 4,791
Originally Posted by 2wheeljonz
Did Campy make a triple specific Record derailleur in the mid-70's? I have never seen one listed.

Also, to eliminate confusion I may have caused, the problem is not in shifting to/from the small chainring but rather shifting onto my large (52 T) chainring. My reference to the 3 mm clearance between small chainring and chain stay was to indicate that it may not be possible to use a shorter spindle to get proper chainline.

If no solution can be found, I may just end up using the large chainring as a "chainring protector" and adjust the FD to eliminate its use.
I understood that the problem was getting to the large ring with a double FD that doesn't move out that far.


The "period correct" solution to your problem is either using a period correct TA "compact" crank with two smallish rings, or a period non-Campy front derailleur.

I get that you are trying to keep the bike period, but you just installed a triplizer and a new RD cage, so maybe you should get more flexible about other components rather than having a useless outer ring. What would someone in 1974 have done?

Last edited by Kontact; 12-26-17 at 02:58 PM.
Kontact is offline  
Reply