Originally Posted by
Bandera
When deciding that style takes precedence over function whether it's period-correctness, the "pro-look" or any other conceit one must accept self imposed handicaps on a machine that is to be ridden rather than hung on the wall for static display. Old designs with limited/single gear ranges, weak brakes, heavy components, odd/uncomfortable ergonomics and idiosyncratic handling characteristics were superseded by designs that addressed those issues decades ago for good reason(s).
Choosing to ride a re-built or replica 40's-'60's period-style machine for any distance with reasonable comfort/pace takes a good period fit, a proper saddle, considerable seat-time for adaptation and the a pair of walk-able shoes.
For a good reminder of how these bikes were actually fitted out and used by club riders back when:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPkT0paGEnQ
I guess that video is bound to appear in just about every thread I start! I'm becoming acquainted with the fit and finish of most of the older bikes that I'm interested in, though I still need to get my hands on a pre-war steel roadster to get a feel for that. I'm particularly keen on finding out of they can be "fast enough" for my tastes.
I've been riding the New Hudson Silver Arrow regularly and enjoy the fit I've got on it, despite the frame being smaller than I would usually like. As you're aware, 23" was a pretty standard "tall" size for production bikes during the golden age of club cycling, so I'm making the best of it! I can maintain 16-18mph for a couple of hours on this bike without any nasty winds, which is about as much as I can hope from a 30 pound machine with 26x1 1/4" rims. Despite that, the bike is perpetually for sale, because there are other steeds I am keener on riding/obtaining.
-Gregory
