Like the type of evidence that used to claim and support such beliefs as reefer madness, cigarette smoking being harmless or roid rage? The problem with these claims is that of their limited scope, or legal/political restrictions. Only recently could doctor even hope to begin testing the true effectiveness of marijuana -- and its still limited in the U.S. Can you guess why?

The many benefits cannabis has been known by its user for decades, bou have to keep in mind that these clinical trials are often biased, or restricted by law, and that someone has to support the research. In that case, there has to be some benefit to those that finance the research. Who would benefit from research on non-consumption?

Consider that there are no trials testing the limits of performance enhancing drugs because there is no legal market for it. All we get from the medical community is the negative propaganda they are programmed with and forced to recite on cue. However, that doesn't mean these products don't work. We can see the results.

Fasting has been around for centuries. Even a naysayer like yourself has to admit that it must have some merit. Otherwise, people wouldn't still be doing it today. In an environment fill with an abundance of easily attainable food, why would anyone deprive themselves for no good reason?

I suggest you try the protocol. Then like millions of others, you won't need any trails or additional evidence or trials to tell you that IF works.