Old 02-04-19 | 04:44 PM
  #46  
rhm's Avatar
rhm
multimodal commuter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,810
Likes: 597
From: NJ, NYC, LI

Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...

Originally Posted by noglider
Years ago, I learned the tire industry's method for rating sizes. They flattened the tire out, measured the distance bead-to-bead, and then divided by 2.5. This will surely yield numbers other than the inflated width, depending on aspect ratio, among other things. I don't know if they use the same rule these days, but if they did, I would not be surprised. That's why it's good to get anecdotes about how wide a tire actually is, if your clearance is critical.
yeah but I'm talking about the conversion of inches to millimeters. 2.3=56? Really?
rhm is offline  
Reply