View Single Post
Old 04-13-19 | 09:41 PM
  #27  
RiddleOfSteel's Avatar
RiddleOfSteel
Master Parts Rearranger
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,850
Likes: 2,832
From: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR

Bikes: 1987 Woodrup Competition - 2025 Trek Checkpoint SL 6 Gen 3 - 1987 Lotus Legend - 2024 Trek Emonda ALR Rim Brake - 1980 Trek 510 - 1988 Cannondale SR500 - 1985 Trek 670 - 1982 Trek 730

Depending on how you do it, slammed (threadless) stems can looks pretty sweet. Comfortable or not, it's like concept cars--exaggerated proportions in search of the visual 'thrust' that the person or designer is going for. I don't find a slammed quill stem to be attractive as the quill stem form factor is to make a "7" and not a single line. Low-set quills are fine, and all of us have a height range that brings about our idea of an ideal "rise-to-run" proportion. This generally gets trickier with tall and short frames, for various reasons.

In the case of my '15 CAAD10 Black, Inc. Disc, the steerer was already cut super low. The saddle to bar drop is the most extreme of my fleet, but hey, horizontal emphasis = speedy looking. I have tan wall 28mm tires (same size as these Schwalbs) on this now, and normally I'm not one for the murdered out look (lol, as I have three bikes with largely this aesthetic, well, they're at least not all matte black everything--that's lame), but man, this thing looks hot.



Stem conversion, with only a 'slammed' look being visually acceptable given the bike's race geometry and purpose. Also hot.

RiddleOfSteel is offline  
Reply